Q&A Sigs or no sigs?

[MiserableBastard]

Sigs can be totally disabled from your UCP, for those people who don't like them.
Also, you can set annoying people as "foes" and ignore their posts.

This is why phpbb3 kicks the ass of phpbb2.

Ah the ignore lists... some how I prefer not ignoring annoying users. Use of the Banstick by mods is better choice. On certain other forum I use, that vent to funny extent, 1/3 members banned or infracted, rest ignoring each other randomly.

To main topic...

I'd allow text signatures or limit size of images by rather fascistic measures. I hate excessive animated signatures that cause epilepsy, if those are allowed they will be used by ignorant dimwits.

[Amped]

too late, already decided. not too big, not too small.

[Starra]

I think small sigs, like Amped's, are fine. Maybe disable sigs if people go over the limit or something?

[Zunu]

^ It's possible to warn users, to delete their sigs, to disable them from using sigs.

[Kanako]

Sigs are eeew. Most people use singers, etc. in their sigs I don't like

[Conan]

Sigs are eeew. Most people use singers, etc. in their sigs I don't like

I turned them off as soon as I arrived.

[Amped]

get used to it. they arent that big anyway.

[Bossy Zunu]

i'm gonna go ahead and lock this thread, since the question was absurd to begin with. the answer is: depends entirely on user preference, end of story.